安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Am i doing this wrong?
maybe you could make a way for the missile to continuously change course to reduce the possibility of hard kill or maybe only if it senses an incoming object
Gonna be enjoying the DLC a lot with some Soviet ship-killing tactics. Thanks for this glorious design!
-The missile will no longer continue to steer in the direction last input when there is no input.
Both of these changes are only LUA code changes to the launcher's two LUA code blocks, which can be easily swapped out to patch an existing integrated Gannet Block II launcher.
MWS B system has been sucessfully integratedand we are ready to send you a prototype for benchmarking.
Thanks again for this engineering marvel.
http://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2580243468
Thank you in advance
You'll have to be more specific in how they aren't working. Tracking their launcher is normal--don't aim at yourself.
-Reducing the Link Per X Ticks on the missile will make the target acquisition more responsive.
-Reducing the Link Sync Interval on the launcher will make navigation and flight controls more responsive.
Doing so to either will reduce the missile's ECCM ability, making it more vulnerable to jamming.