安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
I'm not saying that I only like it when everything is rectangular and at right angles, but I prefer it when the map mainly has lines aligned on the grid and moves away from that just for a few sections, like Mirage CT to A, Overpass middle/bathrooms and the T route to B, Inferno banana... do you agree that it has benefits? For me it's easier to understand the entire layout when I know which parts run in parallel. Really curious what you think about this though.
Anyway, sorry for rambling, I want to repeat that I really enjoy this map! And by the way, de_shift is still my number 1 layout that I wish got an HD upgrade and a permanent place in the game haha
In my opinion, I think map layouts are easier to grasp if you can understand where things are placed on the underlying grid, and when lines are parallel to each other. If you have a lot of right angles, it's clearer where paths are relative to each other. T apps totally throws that off, but there's also the entire B side of the map where very few significant lines run parallel to the axes. I don't know if axis alignment is something that mappers are trying to avoid, but I think a certain amount of it is useful to make the map easy to grasp, especially since most CSGO maps work like that. (...)