安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









I'm not saying that I only like it when everything is rectangular and at right angles, but I prefer it when the map mainly has lines aligned on the grid and moves away from that just for a few sections, like Mirage CT to A, Overpass middle/bathrooms and the T route to B, Inferno banana... do you agree that it has benefits? For me it's easier to understand the entire layout when I know which parts run in parallel. Really curious what you think about this though.
Anyway, sorry for rambling, I want to repeat that I really enjoy this map! And by the way, de_shift is still my number 1 layout that I wish got an HD upgrade and a permanent place in the game haha
In my opinion, I think map layouts are easier to grasp if you can understand where things are placed on the underlying grid, and when lines are parallel to each other. If you have a lot of right angles, it's clearer where paths are relative to each other. T apps totally throws that off, but there's also the entire B side of the map where very few significant lines run parallel to the axes. I don't know if axis alignment is something that mappers are trying to avoid, but I think a certain amount of it is useful to make the map easy to grasp, especially since most CSGO maps work like that. (...)