安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Also, a bit of a tip regarding aesthetic values (read: I want shiny gold stuff on my ship!) - titanium nitride is superhard refractory ceramic that also has a nice gold colour.
In general, quite a few ceramics combine interesting colouration with desirable anti-kinetic and anti-flash properties and can be worth looking into if you aim for stylish, yet practical.
* Your ship still has a single point of failure - single power reactor. Using multiple reactors, spread along the length of the vessel, and some preferably off axis would make the ship much sturdier. Backup RTGs are a nice option too if you also have some low-powered backup weapons or want to use flares despite powerful reactor.
* I consider using RCs on crewed ships cheatish, but if I wanted to use them I would put a whole bunch, offset from axis - maybe two rings of 20? Your single RC is often getting destroyed.
* The ship can turn rapidly enough to kill the crew located in the forward CM - they might be well protected from gunfire, but not inertia. Different crew arangement or less powerful engines might be a good idea.
* More diverse battery might be a good idea. I can usually penetrate single-battery CIWS easier - even if it performs well against one of the missile types I use it tends to be pretty helpless against another.