安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Also, a bit of a tip regarding aesthetic values (read: I want shiny gold stuff on my ship!) - titanium nitride is superhard refractory ceramic that also has a nice gold colour.
In general, quite a few ceramics combine interesting colouration with desirable anti-kinetic and anti-flash properties and can be worth looking into if you aim for stylish, yet practical.
* Your ship still has a single point of failure - single power reactor. Using multiple reactors, spread along the length of the vessel, and some preferably off axis would make the ship much sturdier. Backup RTGs are a nice option too if you also have some low-powered backup weapons or want to use flares despite powerful reactor.
* I consider using RCs on crewed ships cheatish, but if I wanted to use them I would put a whole bunch, offset from axis - maybe two rings of 20? Your single RC is often getting destroyed.
* The ship can turn rapidly enough to kill the crew located in the forward CM - they might be well protected from gunfire, but not inertia. Different crew arangement or less powerful engines might be a good idea.
* More diverse battery might be a good idea. I can usually penetrate single-battery CIWS easier - even if it performs well against one of the missile types I use it tends to be pretty helpless against another.