安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
CIV is first and foremost a HISTORICAL 4X game not a gathering place for CURRENT POLITICAL WOKES
UU: Katipunero
UB: Palengke
UI: Nipa Hut
UD: Kuta (I remember this was in previous version of Kudarat)
Also, may I suggest that Lapu-Lapu be made a unique governor instead of a leader. Thanks for all your mods by the way! Enjoying most of them.
I'm agreeing with the recent comments here as well, there's just.... I would call it "hype without a brain" for requests for Duterte and Marcos leaders.
Objectively speaking, those two, even combined, haven't really done much to stand out, at least by the standard of official Civ6 leaders. I can't even conceive of any good leader abilities for those two. At best their bonuses would be lackluster and quite boring, and at worst, not only completely useless, but harmful to the playstyle the Philippines is supposed to have in civ6, giving it a weaker game than usual. (Also how on earth is one supposed to turn a war on drugs into a leader ability, let alone a good/interesting one?)
If one really wants to know their real historical significance, just ask any Filipino living in the year 2122.
Also, I'm going with what Drinn says, political situation here is already tense and we don't need more oil being added to the dumpster fire
Yes, Vevut.