Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
CIV is first and foremost a HISTORICAL 4X game not a gathering place for CURRENT POLITICAL WOKES
UU: Katipunero
UB: Palengke
UI: Nipa Hut
UD: Kuta (I remember this was in previous version of Kudarat)
Also, may I suggest that Lapu-Lapu be made a unique governor instead of a leader. Thanks for all your mods by the way! Enjoying most of them.
I'm agreeing with the recent comments here as well, there's just.... I would call it "hype without a brain" for requests for Duterte and Marcos leaders.
Objectively speaking, those two, even combined, haven't really done much to stand out, at least by the standard of official Civ6 leaders. I can't even conceive of any good leader abilities for those two. At best their bonuses would be lackluster and quite boring, and at worst, not only completely useless, but harmful to the playstyle the Philippines is supposed to have in civ6, giving it a weaker game than usual. (Also how on earth is one supposed to turn a war on drugs into a leader ability, let alone a good/interesting one?)
If one really wants to know their real historical significance, just ask any Filipino living in the year 2122.
Also, I'm going with what Drinn says, political situation here is already tense and we don't need more oil being added to the dumpster fire
Yes, Vevut.