安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









I'm unclear on what you mean by "...accumulate more slowly and take up less storage space." Does this simply mean that these resource types will accumulate by about half of the normal game's rate?
I suppose this may be more accurate than the vanilla version (I have little scientific knowledge to base a judgement from)... but I'm hesitant to go more realistic when hydrogen is so scarce to begin with. I would go with it if resource sectors weren't so frustrating: when Mars Soil/Mars Rock runs out in a sector after only a few hours of harvesting; I would be doing more dragging around collection equipment than before... which I already feel is more tedius than is necessary.
I'm in favor, but maybe tied with modded maps that scale up the resources.