安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










Also it seems like it has much higher aim and damage with a sword than maybe it should? Taking the Hunter and a Shinobi out on the same mission, the Hunter has a 10% or more higher chance to hit with his sword attacks and does more damage. Not a big deal but it's led to the Hunter in my game being my #1 all star on a preliminary LW2 playthrough I'm about to restart. I'm actually making some ini edits to lower his accuracy a smidge. Otherwise seems to work great!
Anyway now l know this is not a bug, we are just discussing balance. Shame that LW weren't able to make it so the penalties dont apply if you dont move (as per XCOM EW).
Thanks for taking the time to reply.