安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Race is real and there are real, actual differences in both the physical body and the genetics of men of different races. I deny the idea that race and genetics affect crime rates and such, as these are begotten by policies of social engineering designed to enslave the poor (read: post-Jim Crow welfare and the Great Society).
Blacks commit disproportionate amounts of crime and have disproportionately lower IQ (and higher rates of abuse in mixed-race unions) in comparison to their population, but this is NOT because they are black . This is because the government encourages fatherlessness, suppresses economic opportunity, overlooks black-on-black crime, and has a welfare system designed to maintain a class of slaves that vote straight Democrat.
This is a race-neutral aspect of societal engineering. No black man is inherently a criminal and no human being is ever inferior to another simply because of their race.
I agree that higher education should not protect from propaganda, but only if the configuration and policies of a nation preserve free, open academic debate. For that reason, I would rather have education's effect on propaganda be connected to the amount of Marxism in the country, as well as being tied to the Liberalism system. The more of certain demographics (e.g. Socialists, Patriots, etc. etc.) there are, the more affected it should be.
"Race realism," as in, racism, right? Because last time I checked, most scientists agreed that human beings share, at the very least, 99.9% of DNA from race to race, with the only real differences being how much melanin or other phenotypic characteristics being the only real differences. And these differences are minimal, such as how an African has more melanin than a European, or how someone from Asia is somewhat shorter than most other races.
To separate people based off something as arbitrary as race is irresponsible, immoral, and scientifically wrong. It's nothing more than a tool that the ruling class have used in the past - which becomes weaker, day by day - to divide those who are not part of the ruling class (i.e., the working class). I should also mention you talk about how anti-semitism is...natural? And that fascism is natural? I'd argue against that, as well, as the idea of a nation-state is a fairly new one, relatively speaking.
You couldn't be more wrong.
Karl Marx's philosophy was wrong, class warfare doesn't determine history, there is no surplus value and the Labor Theory of Value is utter nonsense. Of course, you probably don't know any of this because you've never read any philosphy either left-winged nor right-winged.
If the world had a "leftist disposition" then why is Race realism on the rise in the scientific community? Why is the idea of equality being debunked by Scientist each and everyday, and the only people preaching it are biased Journalists. And let's not forget the rise of "antisemitism" in the academic world, starting with the famous book 'Culture of Critique' by Kevin Macdonald. Reality isn't right-wing, but it's not left-wing either, it's fascist, Fascism is the true world disposition.
reality has a leftist disposition lol