安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










The campaign ones should except Dynamic Economy and Dynamic Recruitment .
The misc ones like the cameras, blood, garrisons and such should be compatible.
The goal is to greatly emphasize the strategic situation over the faction's character in the decision-making process. In my view, Warhammer is cool because of the unique economic and military conditions of each faction, not inherently it's character and decisions taken on the campaign. By removing this 'bias', the AI's actions now stem solely from those conditions and not from presupposed behaviors.
For example, a human player wouldn't normally attack when they're guaranteed to lose, or ignore a valuable target because their faction "prefers" to defend. They would act rationally to 'win', meaning acting in ways that benefit their faction. The mod tries to create that same level of situational intelligence for the AI, creating a more challenging and less predictable opponents.
can that be..WH lives from it's very different factions and their "presupposed" traits, personalities etc., which all reflect and exuberate deliberately various aspects of human nature. Taking this away, you can also play TW: Attila, Rome, Medieval...anhd even there you have different characters with the factions