安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










I believe it occurs on both Starbound/OpenStarbound from the different reported cases.
As for the suggestion, I did look into something of the sort in the past but sadly wasn't something simple to implement, hopefully in the future.
@KiruhiShay, unsure what could be causing the duplication, if someone finds more details for this do let me know!
In addition, a potential QoL idea I had. How difficult would it be to set up the crafting terminals to display the crafting station's icon on the terminal display to make it easier to tell at a glance what terminal has which station?
I'm using Open Starbound + FU, playing multiplayer. The host doesn't have that issue
Thanks for your hard work, though! Always love having an easier storage system after playing the same game several times
@lasiney, my guess is they changed something in the sapling item building, the terminal itself does not modify any data, when it receives an item it simply "pastes" the item data into the storage, and on retrieval it will once again "paste" the stored data into the output item
@Twinkie, I'm very late with the response, but yes did try some of those methods and I could not make it replicate