安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










I’m curious what age you’ve been playing on, since you gave the other settings
I just would like to say what I played so far on default settings has been a blast. Really makes me feel like an elite force trying my best to pick my battles before I can finally hit critical mass and stomp my foes. I specially like how the starter hero units can solo creep camps.
I'll try to offer more feedback once I try them out on
- Large Map
- FFA
- 6 players 1 human v 5 ai
- Count Difficulty.
I would suggest playing it yourself and making up your own mind , the battles in second edition could be fast and brutal and could be over in a few turns . But at least they gave some real tactical options like overwatch. That is because the objective was to create a cool battle that was fun to play instead of a perfectly balanced tournament game that is usually decided during army creation instead of on the battlefield.
one you go for after having an army that can survive it turning hostile on summon. It just feel strange to have almost all your factions being fairly powerful each in their own way yet the eldar can't seem to beat a baron having low hp , short range and fairly high cost for each unit. But the ranges on all eldar weaponry seem insane to me if i compare them to regular archers let alone cadia.
10 dark reapers against 10 guardman should be a one sided slaughter not a nearly won slugfest with high casualties , the reapers should have far better weapons , range and even armor (they cost far more too of course) . And this should be true in every edition of 40k.