安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The names of the gods are anglesised versions of the Norse gods and so the overlap between the faiths are there. I would agree that the building of henges didn't hold the same place in their faith and so there is probably an argument for replacing it with Ritual Celebrations as the AS Pagans were reported by Bede to celebrate the turning of the seasons.
1. Life is political.
2. @The Victorianist didn't drag politics into it first. @Ġedryht of Wōden did, but I am sure that you only got mad at The Victorianist because he insulted your team on the political aisle.
How do you manage to drag politics into this? If nothing you are the degenerate here.
Seek help.
Most Pagan faiths in Europe never had a name like "Christianity","Islam","Judaism","Shinto","Buddhism" and so on.
A lot of the names we have for them appeared in the 20th century.
Polytheistic reconstructionism/contemporary paganism use these made up names for ancient religions. We have no sources stating a name for these religions.
The only word which was used was Paganism before the 20th century, it was used since the 4th century in the Roman Empire by the early Christians. So that word is much more historically correct than any other name which appeared hundreds of years later.
To note: I see more Rightist degenerates who use shows like the Vikings TV shows as a source.
While there is definitely a new "pop history" surrounding viking attitudes, the idea that they're in-line with contemporary 1800s anglo values is equally ahistorical. Reactionaries are themselves also modernist, so