安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









I doubt that's due to the map itself. It's pretty much just a clean port, without any scripts attached to it.
The building looks cool and is in line with the other two. It's also very climatic with abatis and the lantern and there are windows where they are needed.
It was probably difficult to put it so high on the river bank while peninsula is not as high as the mainland.
Maybe – if you decide so in the future – you could raise a ground higher but not on the whole peninsula but only to make some section of the peninsula bank (e.g. from the building and some short way upstream) regulated (built-up) in the same way as it is now on the opposite side.
In game it could be 'explained' as especially made regulation works made to hold infrastructure on the peninsula side of the bridge. It is common after all to regulate river banks if neccessary. In that way it could be possible to keep most of the peninsula lower and more rough than the mainland (as in the original Lyon) but with the logic exception in line with the newly added bridge and bigger building.
It's just a slight idea. The building looks already great and is fully functional.
Good job :)