商店页面
Train Simulator Classic 2024
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Train Simulator Classic 2024

商店页面
Train Simulator Classic 2024 >  创意工坊 > MaTT 的创意工坊
193 个评价
The Deerstalker (Standard version)
描述 讨论0 留言21 改动说明
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
Train Simulator Routes: Settle to Carlisle, Edinburgh - Glasgow
标签： modern, europe, diesel, Class 67, Class 170
文件大小
发表于
102.977 KB
2013 年 7 月 12 日 上午 7:13
1 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
创建者
MaTT
离线
查看所有 10 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
1,549 不重复访客数
538 当前订阅者
15 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
The Deerstalker (Standard version)

描述
Take the Fort William portion of the Highland Sleeper as far as Ashfield for a crew Change Duration : 60 mins Difficulty : Easy

This is a cut down version of an as yet unreleased full scenario, which includes running light from Haymarket TMD and marshalling the Highland sleeper, however the routing is being unreliable and the signalling buggy, i estimate it could take two days to debug, so I have suspended the project. If this scenario is popular enough and enough people ask for it I will invest the time in completeing the advanced version.
21 条留言
< >
[MO] Martin 2016 年 5 月 28 日 下午 2:04 
Very nice scenario, - thanks !
best regards
htherr 2015 年 1 月 12 日 上午 10:19 
Very nice run! Thank you very much.
[TFA]Wolf 2014 年 7 月 24 日 下午 2:19 
Will do, it is the better loco, it's mind-boggling how RSC could do so much worse.
MaTT  [作者] 2014 年 7 月 24 日 上午 5:46 
Go ahead Wolf ... The original was made with the JT 67, Its a much better drive.
[TFA]Wolf 2014 年 7 月 24 日 上午 3:46 
Would it cause problems if I used RWTools to replace the RSC Class 67 with the JT one?

It sounds better, looks better, and most importantly drives better.
Strangely enough the JT one feels like it has double the power, and the more precise braking system of both.
modge_92 2013 年 10 月 6 日 上午 11:57 
Very nice scenario i enjoyed it.
Thank You.
brian62 2013 年 9 月 30 日 下午 4:06 
great trip, good AI and signals, minimising problems in scenarios is very
much appreciated by all who are lucky enough to play them. thanks............
Premier Taylerov 2013 年 9 月 16 日 上午 4:41 
A valid point, and I respect your advice - your scenarios are highly enjoyable and I find them some of the best out there.
MaTT  [作者] 2013 年 9 月 13 日 上午 5:00 
I dont name trains for a reason, a named train would be expected to follow its path to conclusion, It doesnt add to realism because looking at the F9 map is unrealistic ... Trains only need to be on the correct path when they interact with or pass the player, then they must be got rid of as quickly as possible by the shortest possible route, this keeps performace high and minimises the chances of failures from mishandling like saving and resuming or tabbing at signals, Far from understanding what is going on naming trains would confuse matters and open up the scenario to questions like why is the London train heading towards Dundee?
Premier Taylerov 2013 年 9 月 4 日 上午 11:40 
A thoroughly enjoyable scenario, with interesting AI traffic movements and a realistic timetable. I thought that it could have perhaps been enhanced by naming the AI trains - for me, this adds another level of detail and helps me to understand what's going on (even when the timetable is fictional)! Apart from that, I greatly enjoyed it and recommend it wholeheartedly.