Train Simulator Classic

Train Simulator Classic

132 个评价
[377](AP)2S04 0643 Littlehampton to Portsmouth & Southsea (Career)
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
您需要 DLC 才能使用该物品。

订阅以下载
[377](AP)2S04 0643 Littlehampton to Portsmouth & Southsea (Career)

在 Danny 的 1 个合集中
Danny's Portsmouth Direct Scenarios (Waterloo)
5 件物品
描述
[377]2S04 0643 Littlehampton to Portsmouth & Southsea (Career) AP Version

[377]2S04 0643 Littlehampton to Portsmouth & Southsea

Notes: This is the AP Sound Pack version that requires the Class 444/450 Enhancement Pack and the AP Class 158/159 (Cummins) Enhancement Pack, For the version that doesn't use AP Sound Packs - go here - https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1539435175

Notes 2: While not required - the 64 bit is recommended as this scenario would probably run better with that.

Service2S04 0643 Littlehampton to Portsmouth & Southsea (From Warblington)
Route Required: Portsmouth Direct Line: London Waterloo - Portsmouth Route Add-On

Description: Drive a Class 377 on a Southern Service to Portsmouth & Southsea.

Briefing: Good morning, Driver! You will be driving the last section of the service from Littlehampton to Portsmouth & Southsea today. You will be calling at Warblington, Havant, Bedhampton, Hilsea, Fratton and, Portsmouth & Southsea.

Starting Location: Warblington

Duration: 22 minutes

Difficulty: Easy

Requirements - Route Required:


Requirements - Rolling Stock:
15 条留言
JeThro 2022 年 3 月 1 日 下午 2:14 
Thanks for the Scenario really enjoyed it. Thank you for sharing.
Felix 2020 年 6 月 13 日 上午 7:26 
Gut und kurz, Danke Danny.
chris5012 2018 年 10 月 16 日 上午 5:15 
Very good scenario. I like the stopping points on the platforms - adds a bit of a challenge not to overshoot!! Thank you for sharing this Danny.
jpvdveer 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 6:08 
Thanks - I think the "while not required - recommended"' note works well.
DPSimulation 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 6:05 
Just simply state that the scenario was created in 64-bit and you cannot be certain it would run in 32-bit. I certainly won't be testing over two different forms of TS, it's a lengthy enough process to start with.
Danny  [作者] 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 6:02 
Although e.g. a scenario could run absolutely fine for me on 32 bit, but for another person it could run out of memory :). So if something works on 32 bit for me it might not for others :).
Danny  [作者] 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 6:00 
To be honest I would say running on 64 bit would have been good for most scenarios anyway - more so for routes such as Portsmouth, and more so for Frankfurt route (simply because of the trackwork at Frankfurt alone)
jpvdveer 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 5:52 
Up to you of course. I would surely agree that this only becomes a real issue for scenarios that can only reasonably be run at 64-bit systems. Note that some people on lower specs PC are finding that they do not have the recommended specs for 64-bit and are therefore sticking to 32-bit TS 2019 for now. It would not therefore be correct to presume that everyone will run 64-bit anyway.
Danny  [作者] 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 5:44 
In which case I shall just mention on all new scenarios that it would run better on 64 bit, even though most people would have common sense to run the 64 bit anyway?
jpvdveer 2018 年 10 月 15 日 上午 5:42 
A recent scenario published on one of the well known external forums states explicity that RAM usage during the scenario is up to 4 GB and that, as such, the scenario requires 64-bit TS 2019 to run [at reasonabe settings]. I do think people will increasingly be looking out for guidance in this respect.