安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










lol. dude. that's just not true. these work with just about any big battle rules you care to throw at them, with a little ingenuity and imagination. or grab 2D6 and write your own (like Donald Featherstone did!). without wishing to appear rude, they are what they are. massed toy soldiers for big battles. skirmishes in this period, really aren't my thing, and i'm unlikely to be revisiting.
sorry your comment got zapped. :(
PLEASE tell me I'm missing something.
I've developed a Shape Practice obsession and a friend far prefers ACW to Napoleonics. It's an illness, but the heart wants what it wants.