安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
United States 
Why don't you write a review about what made you not enjoy the mechanics? The most common negative points I have seen about CrossCode were about the platforming (which exploration is all about), puzzle difficulty/enjoyment and some frustration at combat. Combat seems to be the least argued about thing, though. Usually about controls.
All of the above are fair points that I can't realistically refute. I mean I loved all of the above, but at the same time that's a lot more subjective, if someone else doesn't love it that's just how it is. I don't really like first person shooters, for example.
Maybe you could argue the story is repetitive? Nine hours in, I believe not too many new things happen story wise. Most of the story was spent for character development and getting Tronny settled in, IIRC.
I'm also going to delete my negative review, for it defintely does make a lot more sense supporting the developers NOT putting it out, even though it says good things about them.
Thank you for respectfully giving me more clarity on my thoughts!