121
已評論
產品
1896
帳戶內
產品

fidgitswift 最近的評論

< 1 ... 4  5  6  7  8 ... 13 >
目前顯示第 51-60 項,共 121 項
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 30.6 小時 (評論時已進行 21.4 小時)
Dorah thy Exployier
張貼於 2023 年 2 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 36.2 小時 (評論時已進行 5.8 小時)
Fleshed out more, better.
張貼於 2023 年 1 月 28 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 10.6 小時 (評論時已進行 10.5 小時)
Great.
張貼於 2023 年 1 月 9 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 15.2 小時 (評論時已進行 3.7 小時)
Vampire Rogue Company Fortnoit
張貼於 2023 年 1 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 377.2 小時 (評論時已進行 7.4 小時)
Turn off On-Demand Texture Streaming in Quality, under Graphics.
No crash.
張貼於 2023 年 1 月 1 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 59.5 小時 (評論時已進行 11.1 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
Great.

EDIT: **I've played more hours and I've been on the same map for 30 of them. Hours, I mean.
You will hit a point after 500 population when the game will crash frequently. You will have more soldiers than you know where to send. I'm not sure the devs expected anyone to really take the maps to their limits, but every inch of mine is filled to the brim now.

+once you get used to the building mechanic, building is fun

+maps are large and supplement growth of the city

+intuitive management of the people, buildings, their inventories


GRIPES: (after 30 hours on the same map)

-500+ population starts intense lag. 600+ pop causes frequent game crashing

-repetitive courier/merchant/yada yada for no real gain late game

-randomization of Masterpiece "secondary criteria" can make for some not so great combos to build (i.e. frustrating: "place this GARDEN above ALL BUILDINGS" but there's a fort on the tallest hill on your map...)

-300+ pop and the name generator stops (FEMALE #1456/MALE #786) which brings the game to a dystopian area aesthetically

-Pop pathways: I can't stress this enough. If I have a granary right next to the market stalls, both fully staffed, why are the transporters/market stall serfs not SUPPLYING??? If I have a warehouse NEXT TO a builders hut, why are they walking across the map for supplies when they can get them right next door? Why am I getting "no resources" pings when I have those resources and they aren't marked under "stockpile"?

-trade triggers need to happen more frequently. I need to be able to buy more, more often




OVERALL: 8/10
needs minor fixes
張貼於 2022 年 12 月 21 日。 最後編輯於 2022 年 12 月 24 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 6.9 小時 (評論時已進行 3.8 小時)
Wow.
張貼於 2022 年 12 月 21 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
5 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 43.8 小時 (評論時已進行 14.8 小時)
I love Kairosoft.
張貼於 2022 年 12 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 16.9 小時 (評論時已進行 6.2 小時)
Good.
張貼於 2022 年 11 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
8 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 84.0 小時 (評論時已進行 8.4 小時)
TL; DR: It's never okay to make a TCG pay-to-win.

My best friend loves CFVG. He's played it since it came out years ago. It's changed a lot. He's waited a long time for this game to be accessible to him. Because of that, he's really defensive of it. I'm not going to say that I know this, or I know that about video games because I went to school for it.
I'm going to say that this design is unacceptable.

Animations are laughable.
Menu isn't intuitive.
You can't change the keys for accept/back.
SEVERAL QoL implementations were never made.
It's rehashed mechanics.

What really upset me is that the game offers you a tutorial that explains how the game is played, but tells you nothing of RIDE LINES. Do you know what a ride line is? Because I had to ask. Just to make a deck.

This game is not for new players to CFVG and it's embarrassing for those that know how to play and waited this long. Update this garbage, Bushiroad. Apologize.
張貼於 2022 年 11 月 17 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1 ... 4  5  6  7  8 ... 13 >
目前顯示第 51-60 項,共 121 項