安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题


Uh, no. You mean given your existing misunderstanding of science. Colonizing other planets on the scale of billions or even millions of people is completely impossible given our current technology. Geo-engineering Mars is pure speculation.
Of course, my point was that without positing magical technology we'll eventually hit the boundary of what's possible and economic growth will completely stagnate. Or we'll consume the Earth's resources and pollute it to such an extent that it can either no longer support civilization as we know it.
Says the alt righter / Trump personality cultist. Try getting some self-awareness bro.
The Environmental Sect, for example, holds that the Environment is a mother goddess that is most holy. Technology and human advancement are sins against Her.
You're pulling that out of your ass to support your ideology. We need a planet that's capable of supporting our lives in the long term. This is a very human concern.
You can't say this couldn't be possible.
My life is a financial asset and should be available for monetary transfer. Anything else is literally socialism.