安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题

So yeah, what I said second then; 1 year makes sense. 8 years does not. Valve why
Currently ONLY if you have at least 8 years of service.
Didn't really want a discussion about the value of cards. Just whether the 8 years cut off is fair.
I am curious to know one thing: Can you get any trading cards without spending money? Because if not, I don't see a reason to restrict it to even 1 year, letalone 8. Why worry if someone wants to spend money on their alt account? They still have to spend the money, and they'd spend it on their main otherwise, so nothing changes. They're just more obviously rich.
But if so, then I agree with maybe 1 year minimum age. That gives Valve a year to get stats on what the account does, and see if it's a legitimate account or not. Then they could just permanently prevent it from getting cards. There'd be some false positives here from people who don't use Steam regularly, since that looks suspiciously like an alt, but truthfully... I don't see it as a great loss anyway. You're still getting dirt cheap games, so it's not like you're losing.
I JUST made the cut off, but I think it's a bit unfair for people who have been a Steam user for say five years.
I'll set up an Event when I get back in October.