所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
Will be deleted 12 月 8 日 下午 2:01
Expedition 33 and Silksong are not innovative games, so why are they regarded that highly?
Seriously in the past innovation counted for something, but nowdays people seems to regard doing previous thing, but better higher than attempting very bold things and maybe fail or maybe succeded.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 8 条，共 8 条留言
King of Games 12 月 8 日 下午 2:04 
idk, ill have to try E33 before i can give a answer
最后由 King of Games 编辑于; 12 月 8 日 下午 2:05
#1
salamander 12 月 8 日 下午 2:05 
good video games are well regarded
#2
Swarmfly 12 月 8 日 下午 2:05 
The bar is low.
#3
Karhrandras 12 月 8 日 下午 2:05 
They're good games, they don't have to innovate.

I thought Ball x Pit was quite fresh..
#4
Siluva 12 月 8 日 下午 2:08 
Because they are going back to the root of what games are supposed to be : a work of art and passion enjoyable to play.

Not all games need to be innovative or use ultra-turbo-next-gen-RTX grapheekz, as long as the game is well crafted and >>FUN<<, then it's good.
#5
ṼṏẌṏḭḊ 12 月 8 日 下午 2:08 
Team Cherry couldn't lose even if they made a failure because of the Indie game and Hollow Knight fan bandwagons.
最后由 ṼṏẌṏḭḊ 编辑于; 12 月 8 日 下午 2:09
#6
salamander 12 月 8 日 下午 2:10 
引用自 989：
And Hornet has a huge fanbase from what I've seen.

cause cute bug
#7
Midori 12 月 8 日 下午 2:51 
Innovation in gaming is a novelty luxury nowadays that only comes now and again it feels so...
#8
< >
正在显示第 1 - 8 条，共 8 条留言
每页显示数： 1530 50

所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
发帖日期： 12 月 8 日 下午 2:01
回复数： 8
发起新讨论

讨论规则及指引