Todas las discusiones > Foros de Steam > Off Topic > Detalles del tema
Will be deleted 8 DIC a las 14:01
Expedition 33 and Silksong are not innovative games, so why are they regarded that highly?
Seriously in the past innovation counted for something, but nowdays people seems to regard doing previous thing, but better higher than attempting very bold things and maybe fail or maybe succeded.
< >
Mostrando 1-8 de 8 comentarios
King of Games 8 DIC a las 14:04 
idk, ill have to try E33 before i can give a answer
Última edición por King of Games; 8 DIC a las 14:05
#1
salamander 8 DIC a las 14:05 
good video games are well regarded
#2
Swarmfly 8 DIC a las 14:05 
The bar is low.
#3
Karhrandras 8 DIC a las 14:05 
They're good games, they don't have to innovate.

I thought Ball x Pit was quite fresh..
#4
Siluva 8 DIC a las 14:08 
Because they are going back to the root of what games are supposed to be : a work of art and passion enjoyable to play.

Not all games need to be innovative or use ultra-turbo-next-gen-RTX grapheekz, as long as the game is well crafted and >>FUN<<, then it's good.
#5
ṼṏẌṏḭḊ 8 DIC a las 14:08 
Team Cherry couldn't lose even if they made a failure because of the Indie game and Hollow Knight fan bandwagons.
Última edición por ṼṏẌṏḭḊ; 8 DIC a las 14:09
#6
salamander 8 DIC a las 14:10 
Publicado originalmente por 989:
And Hornet has a huge fanbase from what I've seen.

cause cute bug
#7
Midori 8 DIC a las 14:51 
Innovation in gaming is a novelty luxury nowadays that only comes now and again it feels so...
#8
< >
Mostrando 1-8 de 8 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Todas las discusiones > Foros de Steam > Off Topic > Detalles del tema
Publicado el: 8 DIC a las 14:01
Mensajes: 8
Comenzar una nueva discusión

Normas y directrices sobre discusión