Alla diskussioner > Steam-forum > Off Topic > Ämnesdetaljer
Will be deleted 8 dec @ 14:01
Expedition 33 and Silksong are not innovative games, so why are they regarded that highly?
Seriously in the past innovation counted for something, but nowdays people seems to regard doing previous thing, but better higher than attempting very bold things and maybe fail or maybe succeded.
< >
Visar 1-8 av 8 kommentarer
King of Games 8 dec @ 14:04 
idk, ill have to try E33 before i can give a answer
Senast ändrad av King of Games; 8 dec @ 14:05
#1
salamander 8 dec @ 14:05 
good video games are well regarded
#2
Swarmfly 8 dec @ 14:05 
The bar is low.
#3
Karhrandras 8 dec @ 14:05 
They're good games, they don't have to innovate.

I thought Ball x Pit was quite fresh..
#4
Siluva 8 dec @ 14:08 
Because they are going back to the root of what games are supposed to be : a work of art and passion enjoyable to play.

Not all games need to be innovative or use ultra-turbo-next-gen-RTX grapheekz, as long as the game is well crafted and >>FUN<<, then it's good.
#5
ṼṏẌṏḭḊ 8 dec @ 14:08 
Team Cherry couldn't lose even if they made a failure because of the Indie game and Hollow Knight fan bandwagons.
Senast ändrad av ṼṏẌṏḭḊ; 8 dec @ 14:09
#6
salamander 8 dec @ 14:10 
Ursprungligen skrivet av 989:
And Hornet has a huge fanbase from what I've seen.

cause cute bug
#7
Midori 8 dec @ 14:51 
Innovation in gaming is a novelty luxury nowadays that only comes now and again it feels so...
#8
< >
Visar 1-8 av 8 kommentarer
Per sida: 1530 50

Alla diskussioner > Steam-forum > Off Topic > Ämnesdetaljer
Datum skrivet: 8 dec @ 14:01
Inlägg: 8
Inled en ny diskussion

Diskussionsregler och -riktlinjer