安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題



As to the ultimate average standard of living, I have no idea.
That's not what the graph shows, at all.
It shows that sometime around the year 2100, the growth rate will be zero (somehow), but we'll have a population of over 10 billion people.
how about the cat population? will they still be alright?
i think they will be okay, cats are intelligent and resourceful. and small species of cats have some of the highest predation success rate of any animal on the planet. so good that they destroy entire populations of small critters in certain areas and have to move on to another one once the food supply dwindles.
I think if countries isolate themselves from population influx when they are in decline will recover within a couple generation on their own, and produce a more stable population overall.
There was a documentary about small scale evolution of lizards on a few rocky island in the Mediterranean, it was a stable population, they introduced a similar species on the island, they out bred the local population causing it to disappear. Continued breeding until the population collapsed, once it recovered, it stayed at a stable level.
What data is being cited?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nw_cdqQHGA8