Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan



As to the ultimate average standard of living, I have no idea.
That's not what the graph shows, at all.
It shows that sometime around the year 2100, the growth rate will be zero (somehow), but we'll have a population of over 10 billion people.
how about the cat population? will they still be alright?
i think they will be okay, cats are intelligent and resourceful. and small species of cats have some of the highest predation success rate of any animal on the planet. so good that they destroy entire populations of small critters in certain areas and have to move on to another one once the food supply dwindles.
I think if countries isolate themselves from population influx when they are in decline will recover within a couple generation on their own, and produce a more stable population overall.
There was a documentary about small scale evolution of lizards on a few rocky island in the Mediterranean, it was a stable population, they introduced a similar species on the island, they out bred the local population causing it to disappear. Continued breeding until the population collapsed, once it recovered, it stayed at a stable level.
What data is being cited?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nw_cdqQHGA8