安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
25 
檢舉此篇文章
As to your finding in practice, my answer is "I never really know".
My biggest problem here is that I usually don't pay attention to most of my prisoners unless some are doing or have just done something significant.
Unlike RimWorld, there are too many little guys keep coming to and leaving from my prison.
The lead dev of RimWorld believes the max number of characters should be only 24. If more than that, a player will have much difficulty in remembering and tracking and, more importantly, caring about characters.
In PA, I sometimes actively locate and track a few special prisoners. In most cases, dangerous ones.
These guys are not the target of the "Cell Room Grading" mechanism. Instead of punishing them when they misbehave and moving them to better rooms when they behave, I just put them in Max-Sec wing, completely separated from the rest of inmates.
As to less troublesome prisoners, whether they have hope about moving to better rooms seem unimportant to me.
Most of prisoners will be released after some days. I don't think it worth my care about whether and when to change their rooms.
I'd rather working on increase of parole rate.