商店页面
Starbound
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Starbound

商店页面
Starbound >  创意工坊 > Magic Shmagic 的创意工坊 > Old War Armory (Firearms, Cosmetics, Gear) v1.746 > 讨论
Old War Armory (Firearms, Cosmetics, Gear) v1.746
描述 讨论8 留言1004 改动说明
 此主题已被置顶，因此可能具有重要性
Arty  [开发者] 2017 年 7 月 23 日 下午 4:40
<Content Poll>
Hey guys, believe it or not we are in-fact not dead. We've got some content cooking on the stove right now as well as fixes and various other issues that have been nabbing at us - but much to the dismay of Magic, I feel the need to draw in some extra load. So - this is where you come in. Throughout the suggestions polls I've read countless requests for certain vehicles, which those within reasonable bounds seem to be great additions to Starbound. I'm gonna keep track of votes, and a list to acompany them. If you wish to see a vehicle / weapon introduced, suggest it and we'll see if other members of the community agree with you. (If me and Magic like it enough it'll probably get in anyway) The top 1 to 3 voted vehicles will be produced and likely thrown into the next update, along with some of the highly rated weapons and gear if anyone wishes to suggest some.
*Reminder* Keep suggestions reasonable please.

-------------------------------------------Current Votes-------------------------------------------------------

0 :BF109
0 :Ju87-Stuka
0 :P-47 ThunderBolt
0 :YAK-9

0 :Panzer IV (Medium Tank)
1 :Tiger I (Heavy Tank)
0 :Stuart (Light Tank)
0 :Sherman (Medium Tank)
0 :BT-7 (Cavalry Tank)
1 :T-34 (Medium Tank)
最后由 Arty 编辑于; 2019 年 1 月 14 日 上午 7:00
< >
正在显示第 1 - 6 条，共 6 条留言
Donatedelk 2017 年 12 月 13 日 下午 6:25 
Suprised no one has commented on this yet, I guess I'll break the ice after all this time. I would personally like to see the Tiger I implemented, big tank with lots of health and damage, but rather slow
#1
Arty  [开发者] 2017 年 12 月 13 日 下午 6:55 
引用自 donatedelk：
Suprised no one has commented on this yet, I guess I'll break the ice after all this time. I would personally like to see the Tiger I implemented, big tank with lots of health and damage, but rather slow

Thanks. :D
#2
Mav' 2019 年 1 月 13 日 下午 8:19 
Hmm, T-34 good meme. I vote T-34.
#3
Mav' 2019 年 1 月 13 日 下午 8:20 
Also, on another note, are AT weapons gonna get buffed against tanks? Tanks seem sorta OP as all of them can fire fast and are insane damage sponges. Or if it isn't such a hassle maybe reduce the amount of damage the t-26 and tank prototype can absorb? Cheers.
最后由 Mav' 编辑于; 2019 年 1 月 13 日 下午 8:28
#4
Arty  [开发者] 2019 年 1 月 14 日 上午 7:00 
引用自 Ionising_Supernova：
Also, on another note, are AT weapons gonna get buffed against tanks? Tanks seem sorta OP as all of them can fire fast and are insane damage sponges. Or if it isn't such a hassle maybe reduce the amount of damage the t-26 and tank prototype can absorb? Cheers.

Now that you point it out, yeah I think reworking AT would probably be beneficial. The problem is i'm not exactly sure how that'd work though. As it stands any AT weapon would have to do insane ammounts of damage in order to take down any of our vehicles, making it far superior to any weapon we currently have. (Well - I suppose this happens anyway so we may just live with it.)

Although, I can see this happening if we added a seperate damage system to armored vehicles making them immune to all forms of damage except for Anti-Tank weapons, which would take them down quickly... Hmm...
Well, thanks for your suggestion - i'll keep this in mind when talking to Magic.
#5
Mav' 2019 年 1 月 14 日 下午 12:04 
引用自 RD-Duckty：
引用自 Ionising_Supernova：
Also, on another note, are AT weapons gonna get buffed against tanks? Tanks seem sorta OP as all of them can fire fast and are insane damage sponges. Or if it isn't such a hassle maybe reduce the amount of damage the t-26 and tank prototype can absorb? Cheers.

Now that you point it out, yeah I think reworking AT would probably be beneficial. The problem is i'm not exactly sure how that'd work though. As it stands any AT weapon would have to do insane ammounts of damage in order to take down any of our vehicles, making it far superior to any weapon we currently have. (Well - I suppose this happens anyway so we may just live with it.)

Although, I can see this happening if we added a seperate damage system to armored vehicles making them immune to all forms of damage except for Anti-Tank weapons, which would take them down quickly... Hmm...
Well, thanks for your suggestion - i'll keep this in mind when talking to Magic.
Thank you, since iirc it takes something like over 10 shots from a panzershreck to take down a t-26. Maybe explosive weapons could also be considered anti-tank weapons? (just so the other mods I'm using don't get redundant.)
最后由 Mav' 编辑于; 2019 年 1 月 14 日 下午 12:17
#6
< >
正在显示第 1 - 6 条，共 6 条留言
每页显示数： 1530 50