安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The other countries should be following their vanilla paths for historical focuses, I haven't changed much. So are you saying that this is broken somehow or that the vanilla paths that Paradox set up just aren't historical? If it's the latter.. maybe you can write up what they should be doing.
Yes, Romania gives the coup too soon...this helps to change sides when they are losing the war against the SOV, but in reality the coup should occur a little later, on the other hand, Turkey never chose İsmet İnönü as leader of the country after the death of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, he chose a general as leader of Turkey (I don't know who that man is), of the 3 games that I have played with SOV and US, it only happened The Dersim rebellion (did not know what happened in reality) only happened once in a game, Bulgaria should be reviewed, personally it bothers me that it declares war on the SOV when it joins the axis, there is a national focus that prevents that But would Bulgaria have to be a fascist ?? and Yugoslavia has a tendency not to follow the rules ... otherwise everything is perfect! thanks you.
The Kurdish rebellion appears to have complicated mechanics so trying to force it to go a certain way seems to be more a lot more trouble than it is worth.
I don't know what to do about Bulgaria. That focus is locked behind fascism as you say, and the fascist path for Bulgaria is not historical either.
I don't know what issues Yugoslavia has.