安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
0 
举报此帖
The engine nozzles are different as the Eagle II uses the F110-GE-129A engines instead of the F100-PW-229 seen on the older E models.
Internally the cockpit is last gen.
In terms of gameplay here's what would change :
- Due to bigger containers for chaff and flare received with the EPAWSS integration, the F-15EX can carry around 50% more counter measures.
- The F-15EX is apparently capable of carrying two extra AMRAAM missiles on its inner wing pylons. In addition, there are images of F-15EX's carrying double AMRAAM racks under the fuselage.
- If some pilots like SDBs, you might like this. There are photographs showing the Eagle II carrying twelve SDBs total. (8 on either side, with four in the center).
Basically, it's an F-15E with stronger engines, more ordinance options, and better survivability.
It's very likely some advancements made on the silent eagle carried over. This would not result in a stealth fighter, but it would be stealthier than a baseline strike eagle. How effective it would be is anyone's guess.