安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/436111076111159192/4643F1C3D4BB96094D88C6B7DC816C2373F6FC76/
Pz III Ausf. M flame version has same armor values (70mm front hull armor and 77mm front turret armor).
Pz III Ausf. N has original game armor values (50mm + 10mm shields armor).
What is your point?
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/06/on-german-armour/
The extra Front Armour on these Tanks are High Hardness Rolled Homogenous armour. why it wasen't use alot was that it took a long time to make. and it created Spalling even if it diden't penetrate. but this are Front Addon Extra Armour so the Spalling part woulden't matter. and the extra chance/ resistance to penetration it would give. would be better.
So if we go by the 105% That would make the plate 21mm Of Normal Rolled Homogenous Armour.
We could use skip this and just make it 20 though
Gr.38 Hl/A (HEAT)-70; Gr.38 Hl/C (HEAT) -100