安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You could certainly be right I wont reject this thought. I have usually only seen it from the perspective of my allies and good friends, but that doesnt mean it couldnt still be the underlying cause. As Rome I tend to make friends of everyone I can except Epirois and Carthage, and a few other smaller factions that were already enemies of my desired friends. So near Rome I would have armies hanging out from Venice (usually my defensive ally), Dalmatae, Massalia etc, and Athens for example tend to later on sending some fleet(s) to Sicily. So when I take Sicily some of them move their armies down there to loiter. I tend to pull all my friends into war against Carthage, and indeed that is the reason we are so good friends because we have all that enemy in common, so having their armies standing around in italy and sicily isn't all that bad, whether the actual underlying reason may actually have been that they secretly wanted to take my cities ;D. As long as it's no more than a couple in each region, because more than that and supplies can become a problem for my own armies. Although usually a grain pit somewhere will take care of that issue with the +3 supply lines.