安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








DP28: you can get 2 for the price of 1 MG42.
PTRS: equips whole 6 man squads without munition cost (AT conscript, AT penals)
M1919: suppression ability
M1918: rear echelon + 2 M1918 + volley fire = superfast suppression squad
Bazooka: slightly cheaper than panzerschreck (i think) but also weaker
Bren (tommies): relic buff pls?
Vickers K (sappers): heavy engineer upgrade vickers K doesnt consume a slot
PIAT: stronger than Panzerschreck, but less range (i think)
The point is that the axis weapons arent completely superior in all cases and when they are you have to pay for it.
But if you apply the same 'higher DPS -> better' thought process to tanks, you could reasonably limit axis tanks.
Panzer IV is generally considered to be superior to T-34/76, T-34/76 is significantly cheaper than Panzer IV though.
PzKpfW IV: expensive, but a good allrounder. (MG42: expensive, but an excellent LMG)
T-34/76: cheap, more easily spammable. (DP28: cheap, spammable)
I always try to compare ostheer and soviet, as they are the original CoH2 factions and give good examples.)