安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
1 
举报此帖
Bunker,
HP: 480
Armor: 35
Pantherturm,
HP: 750
Armor: 50
Without an MG to deal anti-infantry, it's not that hard for a Penal Battallion to drop satchel charges, a Ranger or Engineer squad to wire a Demo Charge, and practically has no stock method of dealing with an AT gun firing at it.
In my experience, yeah it goes down fast but that's primarily because of the resources you lost from it. Losing a regular bunker doesn't seem too bad of a loss but losing a big panther gun does.
What makes the Panthurm a lucrative option is that it gives the Axis an AT option that's invulnerable to regular infantry fire. It comes MUCH earlier than the Pak 43 but comes with a decent cannon to boot, that can also automatically rotate on it's own.
The Panthurm should never be placed in the front. It works best as a fallback AT screen that covers a wide area, since it can fire in a 360 degree radius, the Panthurm is a hard counter against mechanized tactics; something you won't see the AI do.
Against a normal AT crew, a truck full of Cavalry Riflemen could just circle around them and tear the crew apart, but the Panthurm stops that nonsense with its ability to constantly track and have the crew covered with concrete.
Against the AI, it's a great fallback investment when they inevitably start sending out light vehicles like the death truck, T-70 and Stuart. Just keep it farther back and it'll be difficult to dislodge the concrete AT guard.