安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Edit: Its definetly an interaction with ProgGlands and sth, as adding/removing that gene from a pawn switches ageing off/on respectively... now i just need to find what screws that over
Edit2: Played around with pawn age between mod changes: If a pawn receives the genes at 17 or younger, they age unimpeded beyond 21, it the pawn receives the genes at 18 or older, they dont age at all. No idea if that info helps, but well im still activating/deactivating mods...
Soo either im doing a stupid (which im not excluding -.-) or sth funky is going on. Could you (or somebody else) recreate my setup and run the experiment as well?
Scenario 1: Take Baseliner pawn at age 17, give him the astartes genes and then age him to 18/19. With me they have standard ageing (as they should). Then age further till 21/22, where my pawns still had standard ageing (which they shouldnt)
Scenario 2: Take Baseliner pawn at age 18, give them astartes genes. Mine have age rate 0 at this point, which they shouldnt.
Im running out of ideas to solve this on my side without starting to look into gamefiles ...