安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Could you clarify what you mean by "replacing" an apparel item? Pointing me in the direction of a specific mod that does this would also help me test more easily.
Im not sure if its limited to just patches loaded by a LoadFolder. But it seems replacing a ThingDef for an apparel in any form, as long as its the whole def, causes the error. I eventually changed the patch to change individual parts. The issue with that though is that rimworld has an issue currently where if you want to change the Parent of a def using PatchOperationAttributeSet the inheritance doesnt work, unless you replace the whole def. (wierd bug).
Im not sure if that inheritance bug was the cause of another mod. But either way, it seems the graphical reference for ThingDefs is lost when this happens, causing paper pattern to throw this error and all apparel on that pawn being invisible for that pawn if wearing an apparel that was replaced by a patch.
If you do decide to test without the overrider active, let me know how it goes.
Definitely should consider reporting your issue in the dev Discord.
I'll put investigating this on my to-do list, but it could be a while before I get to it, I'm afraid.