安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
i was playing vanilla and was getting valiant defeat auto-resolves all the time, despite having superior forces
It works like this in vanilla, it works like this with grimhammer. It worked like this in the first two games too. Nothing really changed as far as I can tell.
everything you do affects AR except certain circumstances, where nothing you do affects it
its not very modular at all so we don't mess with it much
even this is a tl;dr answer, so even tl;dr of this, the the answer that is enough for most people is what Venris said
I am not saying Venris has specifically tweaked AR, but the fact is that in SFO it behaves VERY different to vanilla, iikely due to all the stat changes you implemented that have affected the balance. This means you have to fight so many crappy battles manually to avoid losing important units and me and a friend have for the moment stopped playing SFO purely because of this issue, which makes me sad.
This is fully repeatable behaviour, so go start the same campaign in SFO and vanilla and you will see how different the autoresolve behaves.
Also I find that using the Razor Standard on any army increases the likelihood of auto-resolve losses. I can look at a battle where I won't suffer losses and if I assign the banner then units will start auto-dying. It is baffling.