安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Wow, somebody care about this.
I have some plans for map with destruction with bfbc2 style. But i havent any time for doing that motivation and incentive to create a "masterpiece" which adapted to gmod.
It's not hard, it takes a lot of time. Especially when it comes to attracting third-party programs that will do everything for me (or without my participation) - it sounds cool, but in practice it doesn’t work like that. The Source engine is the only one I know where the system you just named is one whole and very painstaking and requires a special approach. This system should only be accessed through very old programs, which, by the way, I use - MilkShape 3D and kHED.
Another feature of the Source engine is the big difference between a physical model and a model that is pre-existing on a certain map - with the second I have more interaction options than with the first. Therefore, as I wrote above - I want to make the first map with destructibility like in good games. But it takes a lot of time, I have a life, job and so on.
Builded with toolgun will be literally bruh, real destructions gigachads want real shiеt like what can looks greate and very detailed