Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
Wow, somebody care about this.
I have some plans for map with destruction with bfbc2 style. But i havent any time for doing that motivation and incentive to create a "masterpiece" which adapted to gmod.
It's not hard, it takes a lot of time. Especially when it comes to attracting third-party programs that will do everything for me (or without my participation) - it sounds cool, but in practice it doesn’t work like that. The Source engine is the only one I know where the system you just named is one whole and very painstaking and requires a special approach. This system should only be accessed through very old programs, which, by the way, I use - MilkShape 3D and kHED.
Another feature of the Source engine is the big difference between a physical model and a model that is pre-existing on a certain map - with the second I have more interaction options than with the first. Therefore, as I wrote above - I want to make the first map with destructibility like in good games. But it takes a lot of time, I have a life, job and so on.
Builded with toolgun will be literally bruh, real destructions gigachads want real shiеt like what can looks greate and very detailed