安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Moving your capital around costs nothing.
The intended challenge here seems to be to:
a) conquer an important province in the middle of the Tzim/Tremere warzone
b) hold it long enough to upgrade it twice
c) which is probably also expensive
Moving your capital is just fluff imo.
1) in that case the tooltip is wrong since it gives the name of your current capital rather then that fixed location
2) this is less a Tzim legacy (hold a specific historical location) and more a personal growth thing (like seeking Golgonda) so having it tied to a specific location is a tad weird as a challenge
3) The Tzim (and guessing all vamps) have an option to go for a harrmonious house - and going that route means that unless you're the Tzim who started with that domain (who gets an empire level thing) you basically have to start a war against your own fam. Which for painting the map is ok (sacrifices gotta be maid) but just seems a bit strange in this context
Mostly its the tooltip thing, sounds like that's just off and its talking about that fixed location
In the lore the Tzimisce are not exactly kind to each other - or to anybody, really. It would be perfectly in character to build your throne out of your uncle for not congratulating you to your birthday or whatever.