边缘世界 RimWorld

边缘世界 RimWorld

PsiTech
 此主题已被置顶,因此可能具有重要性
K  [开发者] 2020 年 4 月 29 日 下午 11:16
Feature Requests
Please post all feature requests in this thread. I might not implement everything posted here but good ideas are always welcome!
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 79 条留言
K  [开发者] 2020 年 5 月 1 日 下午 5:24 
@BUTTERSKY11 As I mentioned in the comments I don't own Royalty which makes any sort of integration quite difficult for me to accomplish. For any sort of integration I think I'd have to make Royalty into a subset of PsiTech which I'm not certain is a great idea either from a compatibility standpoint. Beyond that, there's some major design differences between PsiTech and Royalty that make integration with the right "feel" difficult for me to accomplish.

Essentially, the short answer is that PsiTech will not integrate with Royalty for the foreseeable future.
Bo0g1eMaN 2020 年 5 月 3 日 下午 1:49 
Would it be possible to perhaps lace bionics with athenium to make them have less of an impact on essence loss?
K  [开发者] 2020 年 5 月 3 日 下午 1:51 
@Bo0g1eMaN Probably, using the same system as the psychic weapon enhancement. However, essence loss is the primary balancing mechanic of PsiTech so I'm hesitant to give ways to circumvent it.
K  [开发者] 2020 年 5 月 3 日 下午 2:36 
@BUTTERSKY11 Any such prosthetics would be crafted by your colony since there isn't really any other reasonable sources. The psionic faction is primarily composed of body purist types so they wouldn't make or use such prosthetics.

Even if it was difficult to get such prosthetics there's still the issue of it circumventing the essence mechanic. Essence is there to stop you from combining two late-game pawn enhancement methods into one ridiculously OP super-pawn. In that way it gives you a choice: do you want a cyborg or a psion? There's a great many benefits to cybernetically enhanced pawns, particularly that their body parts can't be destroyed. On the other hand, psions have a higher power potential, at the cost of losing out on cybernetic replacement or enhancement, among other drawbacks.
Jr. Troopa 2020 年 5 月 5 日 下午 4:52 
Maybe make it so that only prosthetic (not bionic or archotech) parts can be infused with athenium, so that you have a recourse if a psion loses an arm, but it's still a downgrade?
K  [开发者] 2020 年 5 月 5 日 下午 4:55 
@Jr. Troopa It's not debilitating to have a part or two on a psion. Certainly it decreases their potential somewhat, but with the recent "buff" to essence loss (it's included as part of your defense against psionics now) I think it's fine to install parts when necessary. If you think the essence loss is too high, it can be adjusted in the options anyway.
cat 2020 年 5 月 6 日 上午 8:57 
maybe make weapons like longswords made out of athenium have a larger buff if a psion wields it
K  [开发者] 2020 年 5 月 6 日 上午 9:02 
@cat Athenium weapons are already very good (especially when psychically enhanced) to the point of being mildly broken, so they probably don't need a stats buff. It might be nice for athenium weapons to be "free" to enhance, and for it just to take work and not more athenium but with the way that the system is set up that's very difficult to implement.
XofBlack 2020 年 5 月 11 日 下午 3:00 
I think biological implants such as from Evolved Organs Redux or regrown limbs from ARoM shouldn't give a penalty. I don't know if that would be possible to implement but it would be nice.
K  [开发者] 2020 年 5 月 11 日 下午 3:07 
@XofBlack That depends more on the way that the mod author designed their parts than on the way PsiTech calculates essence loss. Essence loss is based off of the same counting mechanism employed by the Body Purist and Transhumanist traits, and whether a part is counted for that is based on whether it's considered an "added part" by the game. I'm not a fan of adding specific functionality to address issues with other mods since that becomes a seriously slippery slope of integration with every new mod, so if you want a mods part's not to count for essence loss, try asking the author of the mod to change their parts to not count. In the case of some parts, such as regrown limbs, it would probably make more sense for them not to count.
Robob 2020 年 6 月 6 日 上午 1:16 
Could you add an EVA suit version of the psionic armor?
i kind of want to use psionics in space with SOS2
K  [开发者] 2020 年 6 月 6 日 上午 11:07 
@zxhb I'm not going to add a specific armor type for use with just SOS, but I could tag the existing armors for EVA use. However, they don't look very air-tight with their robe-like bottoms so we'll just have to say there's some psionic something going on to keep people alive in them.
Neko Boi Nick 2020 年 6 月 12 日 下午 5:32 
More of a simple feature request, but could you add some kind of themed walls and floors? I would love to have psionic themed rooms.
K  [开发者] 2020 年 6 月 12 日 下午 5:34 
@thakyZ I'll have to ask the artist if she's willing to make some more art; she's been quite busy lately. No promises though!
最后由 K 编辑于; 2020 年 6 月 12 日 下午 5:34
UpTheArts 2020 年 6 月 16 日 上午 9:26 
引用自 Bad Vlad
@BUTTERSKY11 As I mentioned in the comments I don't own Royalty which makes any sort of integration quite difficult for me to accomplish. For any sort of integration I think I'd have to make Royalty into a subset of PsiTech which I'm not certain is a great idea either from a compatibility standpoint. Beyond that, there's some major design differences between PsiTech and Royalty that make integration with the right "feel" difficult for me to accomplish.

Essentially, the short answer is that PsiTech will not integrate with Royalty for the foreseeable future.
Indeed. Why would I buy Royalty when there are dozens of mods (such as this one, Hospitality, Sparkling Worlds to name a few) superior to it, lol.
最后由 UpTheArts 编辑于; 2020 年 6 月 16 日 上午 9:27
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 79 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50