安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
if you read any of the monster manualls you will know that they can have any appearance there "parent" drempt up abought. tho i agree with the idea that they shold have more skins, arm types and eye shapes.
eddit: i went into a outrage state befour i finished your commet. sorry.
https://www.jsigvard.com/dnd/monster.php?m=Beholder
Here's the statblock for the 5e beholder, no fireball in sight. Anyways, I'm not sure how well the Eye Rays would work as a tech. I mean, the effects themselves would totally work(enervation/death/disintegration doing varying levels of damage, slowing inflicting the ice debuff and petrification inflicting a stronger ice debuff, and so on), I don't really believe that's super balanced.
With tech, normally I get it when at the first planet, and having access to something like Disintegrate at T1-2 is a horrible idea for balance. If you tone it down to the point it's balanced, that doesn't really do Disintegrate justice(10d6 +40).
Also I prefer having all of the movement tech.
What I'm thinking is making them one handed weapons, so you can still launch several eye rays at once, but you get each one when appropriate, so no Disintegrate at iron armor. Sure, it takes away from the random nature of combat the beholder normally has, but I believe it would be better balance wise.
Edit: Oh, and also the antimagic sight destroying projectiles would be neat.