安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I'd intentionally made it so that the houses don't gain actual *ownership* of the planets because I didn't want to take those planets away from the player. I think canonically we see Houses have control of large portions of a planet, but not outright system ownership. There's a risk as well with taking the planet ownership away that the pop factions will ping-pong in and out of existence.
With buildings, I also don't want to clog up the game with hundreds of - effective - duplicates. If we ever get a good system to have one building but conditional names or icons, then sure. But part of what makes STNC faster is that I focus "width" in areas that can support it better.
TBH if that other project does something, that's often enough reason for me not to want to do it. ;)
That said, at some point I want to look at how the Kazon Sects can fit into the House approach, and might look to make changes then.