安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








"State sanctioned missionaries" For the Teutonic Order could use a small buff as the +1 free policies is really nice. Maybe a small culture conversion cost or +1 missionary? A buff to zealous administrators would be nice as well as the -10% stability cost is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ as a theocracy.
"Tatar mercenaries" could use a buff as 10% cavalry combat ability and 2.5% mercenary discipline is kinda underpowered since the only people that would take the reform for the cavalry combat ability is hordes to stack up the combat ability for cavalry and hordes don't use mercenaries as they have no money and limitless manpower. And Europeans/rich countries that take it for the mercenary discipline would most likely use cannons instead of cavalry. The bonuses just don't make sense for gameplay purposes.
Someone on the team ran a simulation where the result was some 20% increase in monarch points. So it might look and feel bad, its should be stronger.
Also, it's supposed to represent a corrupted oligarchy, ruled by elections primarily in name.
The theocracies are getting a overhaul in 1.3, and this will include changes to that tier.
True, Tatar Mercenaries might not be a broken option, but if you compare it to the alternatives, it gives you raw unit quality without a penalty. So I fear that if the bonuses were slightly stronger, it would be objectively better to pick it over both generic military reforms as well as over any specific ones. Compared to professional army you get half the bonus, without extra maintenance or losing mercs.