Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I often see them form 2-4 packs when hunting a hare while they hunt alone when hunting something more dangerous like ibex ram/doe. This often results in my animals being downed by the ibex
Normally there is no need to specify in detail the number of animals in the packs for a particular predator kind, because the algorithm will automatically deduce the number of members in the pack to avoid injuries, ...unless there is a bug, but I have not managed to replicate your examples.
Fixed in 3.0.5.
I can not really add the feature you described, because setting X hunter for prey type Y can not work, because X depends on you hunter type (eg: 3 wolf can handle a bear, while 3 pigs can not. ..), however would it be interesting to add a parameter to force the minimum number of animals in the packs ?
Currently i imitate vanilla behavior when wild predator hunt to feed onself, by taking 3 variables to compute for prey and predator a score to determine targeting or not (base attack, fresh health state and body size).
So i propose to take into account also the average of the following levels of capacity (which are affected by removed or injured body part) to adjust the score :
What do you think about ?
And also my condolences for your semi crippled Warg ... xD
Perhaps if the calculated score drops below a threshold (considered useless as a hunter) a alert could be issued suggesting a peaceful retirement in deep freeze storage for that hunter.
I will look for your second suggestion.