安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Yes, I have always enjoyed this idea, and I fully agree with Gearheart, I think you all are taking this the wrong way, I was just worried this would outclass the medic, but my worries have been explained away, and now people are just straying to far from my first, and only, complaint, which has been fixed, The medic is already the best healer, but the problem is, not enough people play him, this might allow more heals when a medic play is not around, the medic and engineer are two different classes in terms of support, and this proves that
Where this will allow both healing and ammo, it lacks the healing speed of a medi-gun, plus without overheal or Ubercharge, still prevents the medics role as "Deticated healer" being stolen, so PLEASE stop taking my original worry the wrong way, and PLEASE stop bugging Gearheart about a worry that he already explaind THREE times
Uncle Danes idea makes engineer slower (a terrible idea for a weapon meant for frontline support) and just regenerates Engineer's metal and HP without any requirement. Making it a gun fixes both of these problems.