安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The other thing i'd worry about is populating the XCom list. There aren't a whole lot abilitys that'd work well and aren't already in that list.
no offense. mean, the Scythe, Heavy and Psion're pretty much all based off stuff we actually saw them with in Cutscenes (Outrider with her knife, the Skirmisher handling the Grenade Launcher in the Factions preview cinematic if you have L & A enabled, and so on).
Gauntlet class would make more sense as a Skirmisher, because, you know, former Purifiers. Same with a stealthy Psionic being a templar, not a reaper.
little less leeway in the case of the other two, specially Templars. Could see an explosives-specced Reaper that's a mine/trap specialist.
The Dragon would probablly feel better if the animations were swapped to present them as launching fire from thier hands or just snapping thier fingers to make explosions. Instead of relying on a gadget.
All of them actually began life as normal soldier classes, but... well, cosmetic issues, especialy with shard gauntlets was making that a bit icky. Hero classes let me side step those.