What are you trying to say? What exactly is unbalanced about it? I find the StuG E to be a very nice addition to the commander, since Hull Down was a mostly useless or very situationally useful ability and made the doctrine overall too reactionary and defensive to function.

引用自 Onkel Benz：

What are you trying to say? What exactly is unbalanced about it? I find the StuG E to be a very nice addition to the commander, since Hull Down was a mostly useless or very situationally useful ability and made the doctrine overall too reactionary and defensive to function.

+1

German defense doctrine:
because it does not replace Pak 43 with Flak 88
and adds the Flakvierling 38

stug E suffer from being extremely meh even early on vs inf and light vehicules because it cant hit inf reliably nor even take a few hit reliably without bursting into flame...

hulldown was only good with a range increase or your a sitting duck that the oponent can easily ignore. witht he range it was possibel to make pz4 turrets on interesting places.

but removing it even if sad for the gamep)lay style doesnt annoy me too much.

the concrete bunker seem worthless... too fragile and the repair type deosnt repair much at all.

ostruppen and sand bag+trench combo so well its ugly and marvelous at the same time, and it help take and hold early position and have troop to scout and take hit later on