Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Trung giản thể)
繁體中文 (Trung phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bulgaria)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraina)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
这个链接点不开
You do realize there's some difference between the numbers "55" and "20"?
Or maybe 1.4 patch is the cause.
Shame...
Not true at all. 30-40 may have been average life expectancy, but that was only because of very high infant mortality. Most of the people who made it past 20 would have lived easily into their 60s.
I went to a graveyard from the 1800s, and that alone was scary. A large percent of the graves were children, dying from random things. It was really quite sad. People who werent children were mostly in the 60s, 70s, and even saw some 80s.
In medieval times, if you had 6 kids, chances are only 3 would make to adult hood. This is why 30 is the average lifespan back then, but that is very misleading when looking at adult life expectancy.